Rural Fylde Conservatives

Sunday, July 29, 2007

301 posts

Hello,

This is the 301st post on this website since last October. I hope everyone has found it useful and informative. If you have any suggestions on the type of information, comment and views you'd like to see, please get in touch.

Regards,

Simon.
simon@wesham.com 682582

Community Safety Survey

Hello,

I'd like to thank everyone who returned a community safety survey that I e-mailed out a couple of weeks ago. If you're not on the distribution list, you'd not have been sent one, but it's not too late to take part, I can send one out if you e-mail in.

I've had about 40 returned and there are some surprising results. Mainly, people are really happy living in Wesham, that they are not too bothered about crime and their own safety while out in Wesham and that most people are happy to pay extra to the town council every year to see local improvements, as long as they could see those improvements.

There were some specifics raised that will be address individually and there was a small amount of concern about speeding, which I'll be taking up with the relevant police officers.

So once again, thank you all who took part.

Regards,

Simon
simon@wesham.com 682582

Friday, July 20, 2007

Free Swimming

I've made the decision recently to allow all under 16's to swim in both Kirkham and St. Annes pools for free between 9 and 12 weekdays during the summer holidays.

This is as I've also made the decision to cancel the rural swim bus. This bus went once a week around the rural villagers picking children up so they could get one hours swimming. However, in recent years this service has not bee well used by the children and last year there was some trouble. It cost's about £1,000 a year to run, which is basically not value for money in today's day and age where most, if not all villagers have bus routes and most people have a car.

The scheme was excellent in days gone by when cars and buses were less readily available, however it just is not being used, regardless of the advertisement of the service. I really do think that in today's cotton wool society parents don't readily allow children to go swimming on their own, especially on a bus. The usage figures bear this out.

So that is one of the reasons why I am scrapping this service. The other reason is it can only benefit a few and only once a week at that. My replacement scheme allows all children to swim for free when ever they chose, as long as it's in the morning and during the week.

This creates more choice, more exercise opportunity and more diversionary activity. I want the many to benefit, not just the few that went on this bus. I think most people, if not all people feel that the scheme I've introduced is fair and far and away a better system than the bus.

You would have thought so; However, not all are willing to see the benefit of my free swimming. Several independent councillors have got together (so who don't even represent wards where this service used to run!) to challenge and call in the swim bus decision.

I think they are barking mad. Why are they so hell bent on preserving this under used, outdated, unfair service, for the few and why are they not embracing the new scheme that will benefit 9,000 under 16's in this borough.

I say swimming for the many, they say swimming for the few. The young people of Wesham will benefit from this scheme as transportation to Kirkham baths is not a real issue. However, with the bus service, Wesham's young people would not benefit at all.

So this is the bizarre situation we're in. One Wesham Councillor, ie me want to give free swimming to all Wesham's and the Borough's young people, the other councillor in Wesham want to stop my scheme and stop Wesham's children from 6 weeks of free swimming. So much for representing Wesham's interests!

Swimming for the many, or swimming for the few, simple choice.

If you want any further information on this please call or e-mail

Regards,

Simon
simon@wesham.com 682582

Friday, July 13, 2007

Lowther Gardens

I was asked by the Cabinet a few weeks ago to look at a way in which Lowther Gardens, which is a stand alone charitable trust, could cost the tax payers less and stand on it's own two feet. Currently £134,000 a year is used of the Councils General Funding to support Lowther and that's after all the income is taken into account.

I felt an immediate way was to introduce a charging scheme in the car park. This would bring in annually £10,000 to £15,000 and in conjunction with other measures in the pipe line will help reduce that cost to us all.

With the charges, the first hour is free and after 6pm it's free. However, some people seem to think it is wrong. However, I feel the general principal that the Gardens should stand on it's own two feet is right and I made the decision to do so.

I strongly feel that people will not be put off about going to Lowther and in time it will become accepted, especially when the result is the continuation of a Green Flag Standard park and garden.

However, I'd welcome your views on this.

Regards,

Simon.
simon@wesham.com

This weeks cabinet

On Wednesday this week it was Cabinet. I attended in my role as Cabinet Member for Culture and Tourism. I presented one item on the agenda which was the Council's Play Strategy. I can understand people who think, 'oh, no another glossy document' and sometimes I agree that we do produce too much paper work.

However, this one maybe a way into £200,000 of lottery funding to provide play equipment and facilities throughout the borough, but in spite of that, it is a document that we need as it helps the council decide on the priorities when it comes to play spending. With more and more housing developments coming on line throughout the Fylde, the planning gain monies can now be spent on play facilities in a co-ordinated manner that fits the gaps that the strategy has highlighted.

Also at the meeting we heard a report from the finance officer that Fylde is currently facing a £1m funding short fall next year, on a budget of around £10m, so a 10% cut is expected.

I asked the reasons why and the answer may not be to surprising. It boils down to this Government. The Labour Party has hit Fylde hard, free bus travel is still not being funded properly meaning everyone in this borough picks up the cost. The government are cutting our support grant by £300,000. They are messing about with benefit delivery grants, cutting other schemes and yet are tying our hands by capping tax.

I understand that the last point my be controversial. But it's true, if you take all the other taxing bodies, like County, the Police, the Fire Authority and the Town Council. Fylde asks for £16 a month to do what it has to and a whole lot more. It's the second lowest in the county and it's is nationally low. However, we live in a borough where people have high expectations of what the council should deliver, like pools, car parking, a theatre, perfect parks, clean streets and a world class bin service. That's a tall order on £16 a month.

This low tax which is hamstringing the expectations of the population is a legacy of the Independents control of the council, when their only policy was to keep the rates low. We now collect so little money we can't afford to maintain our buildings and every year is a struggle to balance a budget.

As a Conservative I am naturally against people paying higher tax. I want tax low, but I also want a borough council that can afford to do the great things that's public want to see done.

This is a debate we need to have as a borough. For every 1% rise in council tax brings into Fylde Council about £45.00 but costs you £1.60 a year, or 16p per month (council tax is only collected for ten months). This is not my policy, but it is the starting point of a debate. IF council tax went up say 20% one year that would increase income to the council by £900,000 and would cost each tax payer another £3.20 a month. The increase in the council's spending power would be phenomenal meaning we could do all the things that people write to the papers saying we should be doing. There'd be no doubt about the pools, the parks, Tourism, the arts, events, the streets, the bins anything would be possible (with in reason).

Remembering this is a debate and not a prescribed course of action, to reduce spending by that much would see the closure of both pools, Lowther Pavilion, the Games sites and Fairhaven. Is that acceptable?

So in a nut shell we have a number of options, these being;

A big one of tax rise

Massive spending cuts making tough decisions

As Winston Churchill's motto was, we'll keep buggering on, and find that white rabbit every year

A mixture of the first three

Manage expectations, so people expect less

Think out of the box and hope something occurs on the horizon.

As this is a debate, I'd love to hear your views. And as I keep saying, this is not my policy or my thoughts, more of an open ramble about the problems of local government finance in a borough where people rightly have high expectations.

Regards,

Simon
simon@wesham.com

The LGA Conference

Last week I attended the LGA conference on behalf of the Leader of the Council. This was a fantastic opportunity to meet with other senior councillors and officers from around the council. I attended several of the sessions. The most interesting on one David Cameron's. David spoke fluently on how a future Conservative government would devolve decision making, power, cash and responsibilities to the lowest form of government he could. This hit the spot for the conference who clapped wildly at that prospect.

By giving local government the powers to run affairs locally without central interference, you set local areas free to make their own choices, these choices will result in either good decisions or bad, but then the local population can judge those decisions and decide how to vote.

The most impressive part of David's performance, was not his speech, which was good, but how he answered questions asked by delegates. The answers proved he was on top of his brief and knew a wide range of problems. I wanted to ask he a question on the encouragement and retention of younger councillors, ie under 40's as there is a distinct lack of them.

Regards,

Simon
Simon@wesham.com

Two quick points

Firstly following my intervention a big pot hole on Garstang Road North, where it meets Church Road should have been filled in.

Also, a pavement drain that was blocked and causing flooding on Station Road has been cleaned and unblocked.

Keeps these little things coming in and I'll get them sorted.

Regards,

Simon
Simon@wesham.com

Morland Avenue

I've got the county to agree to patch up some of the broken pavement on Morland Avenue as a temporary fix. On a more permanent basis I've made county agree to including Morland Avenue in the slurry seal program that is happening on some streets in Wesham in the Autumn.

This will fill in all the crack, re seal and tighten the foot paths. It's not as good as completely resurfacing but it does hold the pavement together for another 5 to 10 years.

Regards,

Simon
simon@wesham.com

No Ball Games Signs

Hello,

Just a quick note to say that the No Ball Games Signs are going up on Monday in Princess Avenue and Billington Street, just in time for the Summer Holidays. I've had these put up following residents requests and I know we should be encouraging sporty activity, but we do have places where football can be played and that's not necessary in the streets or bits of grass by peoples homes and cars.

I've also requested a couple down Wesham Hall Road, but these are taking a little longer than I had hoped for.

Regards,

Simon
simon@wesham.com

Tuesday, July 03, 2007

Away

Hello,

I am away from home at the Local Government Association Conference in Birmingham until Friday afternoon.

If you need to contact me you can e-mail and I will respond on my return, my wife is still at home so you can ring on 681983 and leave a message with her or if you really need to get hold of me my mobile number is 07837 361258 and you can ring or text.

At the conference I will be seeking out information on young peoples issues and tourism. As well as a great deal of networking and finding out how other councils in the country do things.

Regards,

Simon
Simon@wesham.com